On Friday 11 December 2009, Frans Pop wrote: > And that looks to be the issue described in this bug report: > http://bugs.debian.org/502336
I've just done some debugging in rdate of this problem, and it looks to be a calculation bug in rdate (either due to incorrect handling of overflow or maybe endianness). See the BR linked above for details. On Friday 11 December 2009, Joey Hess wrote: > Why isn't base-installer's setting of --ignore-time-conflict avoiding > this problem? No idea. But I'll let someone else look into that aspect. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
