Otavio Salvador wrote: > >From my side you have a "go ahead" but I'd like to hear from Colin and > Joey if they can think about any con about doing it.
No objection to the concept.
Code review:
+ while (fgets(buf, sizeof(buf), infp)) {
+ if (strncmp(buf, "data.tar.", 9) == 0) {
+ compression_type = buf + 9;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
There is no point in looping here, because if the ar -t output is somehow
longer than sizeof(buf), the data.tar.* output could be split across buffers
and so you've already lost. Anyway, with a buffer of 8192, that won't
happen unless the deb format changes in a very unexpected way.
FWIW, this code would fail if the dpkg format got a new member named something
like data.tar.gz.sign.
+ puts(buf);
leftover debugging?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
