On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 17:21, Philipp Kern <pk...@debian.org> wrote: > Otavio, > > am Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 04:55:12PM -0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben: >> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 23:14, Otavio Salvador <ota...@ossystems.com.br> >> wrote: >> > On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 13:26, Philipp Kern <pk...@debian.org> wrote: >> > ... >> >> So my proposal is to switch the udeb compression default in dpkg to xz >> >> for wheezy, when the busybox and udpkg changes have landed. Then most >> >> udebs will get a translation upload anyway, if not they can be binNMUed >> >> to pick up the right compression. >> > ... >> > From my side you have a "go ahead" but I'd like to hear from Colin and >> > Joey if they can think about any con about doing it. >> What is the current status of it? > > blocked on inconclusive feedback of the dpkg devs on using the extreme variant > of xz (see #647915). We could start with -z0 of course, which would be > supported by dpkg-dev and hence a trivial patch of debhelper would do. > But it doesn't gain that much.
Dpkg people, can you comment on that? I've pinged people on IRC already about this bug earlier today. > In other news I didn't yet upload the udpkg change because I waited for a > busybox upload to incorporate the already committed unxz inclusion. This has already been done. Please go ahead with udpkg then :-) -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkr2m9qyvrapbsvsnzsl3zcz3wl0vw68_pscpjayqq8...@mail.gmail.com
