Holger Wansing <hwans...@mailbox.org> (2024-10-03): > And that logic in tests/desktop controls indeed, if desktop task > is pre-selected. > Maybe it's time to raise that limit once again?
Yeah, that looks plausible. > Of course, one might ask, what has changed in the last few weeks: > that might be the size of partition (however since you used the > small_disk recipe, that should only be marginal), or maybe some > dependencies have changed at some point, so that more packages > are now included in the default desktop. > > But either way, at the end we will need to raise the limit above by > 1 or 2G anyway, to get this solved IMO. That would work for me, yes: I think it's better to provide safe defaults, and let people who want to have a desktop environment select it; maybe they'll get lucky and it'll fit, maybe that won't be the case. Seems better than selecting something by default without being sure it does fit? Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
