On 02.03.2011 17:54, Martin Guy wrote: > On 2 March 2011 02:34, Matthias Klose <d...@debian.org> wrote: >> armel (although optimized for a different processor) > > Hi > For which processor (/architecture) is it optimized, and do you mean > optimized-for, or only-runs-on? > I ask in case this would mean dumping all the armv4t systems that are > using Debian armel.
I didn't propose changing the minimum required processor for armel. I said that 4.5 looks ok, although I can only say that for another processor default (armv7-a). Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d6e787c.9090...@debian.org
