On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 11:05:28 +0200, Petr Salinger wrote: > >>or run tested the code, so if someone with an eglibc > >>build-tree around could test the attached patch (against the > >>glibc-ports tree) that would be pretty helpful > > > >With slight modification in progress.
Thanks for the building and testing! > There are failures in testsuite, at least ptsname.c have to be > updated too. Ah right, had a small change for that one, but as there seemed to be more changed needed there I didn't include it, was not suspecting it would cause test suite failures. :) Attached now. Although the line with: p[0] = 't'; seems a bit suspicious, but then I've not analyzed the function in depth. thanks, guillem
Index: kfreebsd/ptsname.c =================================================================== --- kfreebsd/ptsname.c (revision 3434) +++ kfreebsd/ptsname.c (working copy) @@ -26,8 +26,11 @@ #include <unistd.h> +/* Directory where we can find the slave pty nodes. */ +#define _PATH_DEVPTS "/dev/pts/" + /* Static buffer for `ptsname'. */ -static char buffer[sizeof (_PATH_TTY) + 2]; +static char buffer[sizeof (_PATH_DEVPTS) + 20]; /* Return the pathname of the pseudo terminal slave associated with
