Wiadomość napisana przez Jonathan Nieder w dniu 2011-06-17, o godz. 12:01: > Robert Millan wrote: > >> I wouldn't consider kfreebsd-9 a solution to your linprocfs >> problem, it is only barely usable yet (see >> http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2011/06/msg00208.html) > > Let's add to that list. ;-) > > lock order reversal: > 1st 0xffffff803d300018 bufwait (bufwait) @ kern/vfs_bio.c:2658 > 2nd 0xfffffe000257e800 dirhash (dirhash) @ ufs/ufs/ufs_dirhash.c:284
It's a false positive, IIRC. -- If you cut off my head, what would I say? Me and my head, or me and my body? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/01497ce3-7285-4211-a1bc-9bda6185d...@freebsd.org
