Hi all, I appreciate everyone's interest in this matter, but it's completely unrelated to bug #651624.
So please drop 651...@bugs.debian.org from CC, thanks! 2012/2/10, Benjamin Kaduk <ka...@mit.edu>: > On Thu, 9 Feb 2012, Hannes wrote: > >> >> I was under the impression that the ZFS kernel code in FreeBSD is original >> >> work under the 2C-BSDL . At least the headers in >> /usr/src/sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/kern >> give this impression. >> So only the userland code (lib and tools) is under CDDL. > > My impression was that there was a specific effort to implement a set of > headers and in-kernel hooks as original work under the BSDL, that would be > sufficient to allow a CDDL-licensed module to be loaded at runtime and > still supply ZFS functionality. > This way, the stock kernel that is shipped is entirely BSDL, but the > existing bulk of the CDDL ZFS code can be used with only minimal changes > for compatibility. > /usr/src/sys/modules/zfs/Makefile is enlightening on where things come > from, most notably > /usr/src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/. > These files have the CDDL header in them. > > -Ben Kaduk > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: > http://lists.debian.org/alpine.gso.1.10.1202092053100....@multics.mit.edu > > -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOfDtXPjfGyADRCsQgjttVdUa--JOtTKfrEb=_cgndyn4u9...@mail.gmail.com