Hi Damien, El 23 de març de 2012 0:49, Damien Raude-Morvan <draz...@debian.org> ha escrit: >> Also AFAIK openjdk-7 has never been a blocker, since it's also unavailable >> on other release architectures. > > Hum? Other "release target" architectures are in sync : > openjdk-7-jdk | 7~u3-2.1-3 | wheezy | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, ia64, > mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc > openjdk-7-jdk | 7~u3-2.1-3 | sid | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, ia64, > mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc > > AFAICT, only kfreebsd-* and hurd-* are missing. > Event, if it's not a blocker, Java JVM server (headless) support seems a > common use case for kfreebsd, isn't it ?
Please don't take it the wrong way. I think everybody will agree that openjdk is very important. In fact I'm very happy to see progress in this area. My question was, rather, whether lack of openjdk would prevent a release. In the past it didn't (Squeeze), but this seems to be changing now. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOfDtXOi=d-e3+wdwdhwso6esdhnlla5xwrhczxiub+nxxm...@mail.gmail.com
