On 14:08, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2012/5/18 Steven Chamberlain <ste...@pyro.eu.org>:
> > On 18/05/12 17:52, Sebastian Harl wrote:
> >> /usr/include/kvm.h requires sys/types.h:
> >
> > I think that is deliberate, and the user is expected to include it
> > first;
> 
> Uhm no.  You should check such things on FreeBSD before jumping to
> conclusions :-)

I don't even know why I said that now...  s/think/suspect maybe/

So due to this kludge, some headers must now include sys/types.h, because on 
upstream FreeBSD the appropriate definition would be been provided by GCC?  The 
new typename is fairly self-documenting now anyway. :)

I'm still confused why some of the kkh /tests/*.c include kern/sys/types.h

Regards,
-- 
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120519134444.ga3...@loongson.pyro.eu.org

Reply via email to