Hi Robert, Robert Millan wrote:
> This isn't a kernel bug. The kernel recognizes O_CLOEXEC properly > when userland uses it. > > The problem is that userland isn't actually using O_CLOEXEC, because > its declaration is missing in glibc headers. Actually it's already > been reported: see #679198. When did O_CLOEXEC get involved? This report was about a use of FD_CLOEXEC. Thanks, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120630032337.GA3295@burratino

