Your message dated Fri, 04 Feb 2005 11:05:20 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#293536: bacula-sd does not include the bscan binary
'bscan' refered to in the docs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Feb 2005 07:01:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 03 23:01:32 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 203-217-15-10.static.iinet.net.au (ramjet.local) [203.217.15.10]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CwxT9-0007FH-00; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 23:01:31 -0800
Received: from simon by ramjet.local with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CwxSa-0005OT-WF; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 15:00:57 +0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: simon kirkby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: bacula-sd does not include the bscan binary 'bscan' refered to in the
docs
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 15:00:56 +0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: bacula-sd
Version: 1.36.1-1
Severity: important
bscan is important to the bacula system
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-386
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages bacula-sd depends on:
ii bacula-common 1.36.1-1 Network backup, recovery and verif
ii debconf 1.4.30.11 Debian configuration management sy
ii libacl1 2.2.23-1 Access control list shared library
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libcomerr2 1.35-6 The Common Error Description libra
ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-6 GCC support library
ii libkrb53 1.3.6-1 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii libpq3 7.4.6-7 PostgreSQL C client library
ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-2 SSL shared libraries
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-5 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libwrap0 7.6.dbs-6 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-3 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 293536-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Feb 2005 10:05:54 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 04 02:05:54 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from quark.amimatica.com [213.139.24.154]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cx0LZ-0008P6-00; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 02:05:54 -0800
Received: from [213.100.42.181] (c213-100-42-181.swipnet.se [213.100.42.181])
by quark.amimatica.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 371D186A2; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 11:05:22 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 11:05:20 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Luis_Tall=F3n?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: simon kirkby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#293536: bacula-sd does not include the bscan binary 'bscan'
refered to in the docs
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
simon kirkby wrote:
>Package: bacula-sd
>Version: 1.36.1-1
>Severity: important
>
>
>bscan is important to the bacula system
>
Indeed it is. You have *three* bscan binaries instead of just one in the
package:
----------
$ dpkg -L bacula-sd | grep bscan
/usr/lib/bacula/bscan.sqlite
/usr/lib/bacula/bscan.mysql
/usr/lib/bacula/bscan.pgsql
/usr/share/man/man8/bscan.8.gz
/usr/share/man/man8/bscan.sqlite.8.gz
/usr/share/man/man8/bscan.mysql.8.gz
/usr/share/man/man8/bscan.pgsql.8.gz
-----------------
For the reasons of doing this, see the RATIONALE file in Bacula sources
or ask me directly.
Please take a closer look next time before filing a 'severity: important
bug'. Thanks.
J.L.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
