Your message dated Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:17:37 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line java-package: sudo should be used as an alternative to fakeroot
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Feb 2005 01:27:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 06 17:27:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cwv.tor.istop.com (raven) [66.11.164.82]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CxxgU-0000L9-00; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 17:27:26 -0800
Received: from colin by raven with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1Cxxg1-0001XY-00; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 20:26:57 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Colin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: java-package: sudo should be used as an alternative to fakeroot
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 20:26:57 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Colin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: java-package
Version: 0.19
Severity: wishlist
I use sudo to simulate root priviledges, not fakeroot. sudo should be
considered an alternative to fakeroot.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-cv
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 293951-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Feb 2005 14:17:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 08 06:17:37 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 220pc220.sshunet.nl (mordor.wolffelaar.nl) [145.97.220.220]
(Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CyWBN-0002Lu-00; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 06:17:37 -0800
Received: from jeroen by mordor.wolffelaar.nl with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CyWBN-0006pp-CQ
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 15:17:37 +0100
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:17:37 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: java-package: sudo should be used as an alternative to fakeroot
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 08:26:57PM -0500, Colin wrote:
> I use sudo to simulate root priviledges, not fakeroot. sudo should be
> considered an alternative to fakeroot.
Due to sun packages doing all kind of weird stuff to your system when
running real root, java-package will actually refuse to work under real
root (sudo), so sudo is not an adequate alternative, and fakeroot is
actually required.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
