Your message dated Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:26:15 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#295876: mount(8) should mention /proc/mounts limitations
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Feb 2005 19:00:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 18 11:00:30 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.185]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D2DMb-0004N8-00; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:00:30 -0800
Received: from [212.227.126.207] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de)
by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 1D2DMa-0006Bz-00; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 20:00:28 +0100
Received: from [80.134.224.200] (helo=scotty.home)
by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (TLSv1:EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
(Exim 3.35 #1)
id 1D2DMa-0001D0-00; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 20:00:29 +0100
Received: from scotty.home (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by scotty.home (8.13.2/8.13.2/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j1IJ0QO1006484
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
Fri, 18 Feb 2005 20:00:26 +0100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by scotty.home (8.13.2/8.13.2/Submit) id j1IJ0Qxr006482;
Fri, 18 Feb 2005 20:00:26 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Authentication-Warning: scotty.home: hs set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using
-f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Stefan-W. Hahn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: fails to umount a user mounted device as user
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 20:00:26 +0100
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.81, clamav-milter version 0.81b on scotty.home
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de [EMAIL PROTECTED]
auth:77aa76da759ebc9bab1cc524fc813130
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: loop-aes-utils
Version: 2.12a-3
Severity: normal
With ae-loop-utils package installed you cannot umount a user mounted device as
normal user, as expected.
For example a device is declared in /etc/fstab as follows:
/dev/sde1 /media/stick vfat rw,user,noauto,noexec,umask=000
0 0
Then it should be possible to mount as normale user (this is ok) and to umount
as normal user (which doesn't work).
After deinstalling loop-aes-utils, which reverts the diversion to the normal
mount, umount, everything works as expected.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (400, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages loop-aes-utils depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 295876-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Feb 2005 13:26:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 26 05:26:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (mx01.hinterhof.net) [83.137.99.112]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D51xn-0005jm-00; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 05:26:31 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mx01.hinterhof.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 079EE10F10
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:26:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dp.roam.hinterhof.net (pD958DC6E.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
[217.88.220.110])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "dp.roam.hinterhof.net", Issuer "hinterhofCA" (verified OK))
by mx01.hinterhof.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6797C10AFA
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:26:35 +0100 (CET)
Received: by dp.roam.hinterhof.net (Postfix, from userid 1003)
id 6347D4FD5C; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:26:16 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:26:15 +0100
From: Max Vozeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#295876: mount(8) should mention /proc/mounts limitations
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
I wrote:
> The problems with /proc/mounts are documented in mount(8), although
> not in the version from loop-aes-utils. (I'm investigating why)
Turns out I had an old uncompressed copy of mount.8 installed. The
man page included in loop-aes-utils does mention the limitation, so
I'm closing this bug.
cheers,
Max
--
308E81E7B97963BCA0E6ED889D5BD511B7CDA2DC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
