Your message dated Sat, 30 Dec 2006 14:04:19 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384020: RM: slsc -- RoQA (/RoM); better alternatives, out
of date
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
See the tail end of the discussion in bug #315641. The maintainer
agrees that slsc should be removed.
This opens the way to a possible removal of slang1 (the 'slang'
source package), but I'm not sure whether the maintainers are ready
for that yet or not. (slsc was the last package depending on slang1.)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 07:58 -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Package: ftp.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> See the tail end of the discussion in bug #315641. The maintainer
> agrees that slsc should be removed.
slsc was removed from unstable a week ago, closing #315641.
Therefore, closing this bug.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
