Your message dated Fri, 2 Mar 2007 23:05:59 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Usertags fixes this bug; no additional information
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: debbugs
Severity: wishlist
There is need for different tag for cases where the user as misunderstood
or he didn't found the correct documentation. Marking such bugs 'closed'
would better have tag 'notbug'. The 'wontfix' is really interpreted
as 'I don't gime a d--m' as expressed in Debian devel.
This is Feature request based on idea of Linas Evirblis in Debian
devel.
Jari
See thread.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/07/msg00064.html
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Usertags pretty much fix these bugs, and since there has been no
response to the requests for additional information, I'm closing these
bugs.
Don Armstrong
--
If a nation values anything more than freedom, it will lose its
freedom; and the irony of it is that if it is comfort or money it
values more, it will lose that, too.
-- W. Somerset Maugham
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
--- End Message ---
