Your message dated Sat, 7 May 2005 20:47:34 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line rbldnsd: Please package version 0.995
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 May 2005 06:42:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 03 23:42:19 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 203-59-160-42.dyn.iinet.net.au (harp.internal.neep.com.au)
[203.59.160.42]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DTDaM-0003XZ-00; Tue, 03 May 2005 23:42:18 -0700
Received: from harp.internal.neep.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by harp.internal.neep.com.au (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id
j446gC8W011508
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 4 May 2005 14:42:12 +0800
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by harp.internal.neep.com.au (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) id
j446gAFH011506
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 4 May 2005 14:42:10 +0800
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 14:42:08 +0800
From: Andrew Shugg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: rbldnsd: Please package version 0.995
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UugvWAfsgieZRqgk"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-URL: http://www.neep.com.au/
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.84, clamav-milter version 0.84e on
harp.internal.neep.com.au
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: rbldnsd
Version: 0.994b
Severity: wishlist
Hi Michael,
I know you're the upstream maintainer as well as the Debian package
maintainer, so I'm 99% sure you're aware that there have been a few
new releases of rbldnsd since 0.994b that's in Debian. I like the look
of the fixes and improvements in the Changelog, so will you be uploading
an up-to-date package to unstable soon?
Thanks,
Andrew S.
--=20
Andrew Shugg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.neep.com.au/
"Just remember, Mr Fawlty, there's always someone worse off than yourself."
"Is there? Well I'd like to meet him. I could do with a good laugh."
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27
Locale: LANG=3DC, LC_CTYPE=3DC (charmap=3DANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages rbldnsd depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared librarie=
s an
-- no debconf information
--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCeG69pUiZIVCapKgRAqSbAJ46dO9fv86Y3YUbsylOZXcdBykINQCgl3sX
Htr/rGaLBrnO62LJPFXQmd4=
=4zuj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 307604-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 May 2005 18:47:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 07 11:47:37 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pizarro.unex.es [158.49.8.2] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DUUKv-0005d9-00; Sat, 07 May 2005 11:47:37 -0700
Received: from localhost (almendralejo.unex.es [158.49.8.199])
by pizarro.unex.es (Postfix/MJ-1.08) with ESMTP
id 2FE97A1D1B; Sat, 7 May 2005 20:47:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pizarro.unex.es ([158.49.8.2])
by localhost (emilio [158.49.17.20]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 10069-08; Sat, 7 May 2005 20:48:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from guadiana.unex.es (guadiana.unex.es [158.49.17.23])
by pizarro.unex.es (Postfix/MJ-1.08) with ESMTP
id 454EFA1CCA; Sat, 7 May 2005 20:47:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from guadiana.unex.es
([158.49.17.23] helo=localhost ident=sanvila)
by guadiana.unex.es with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1DUUKq-00021L-00; Sat, 07 May 2005 20:47:33 +0200
Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 20:47:34 +0200 (CEST)
From: Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Andrew Shugg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: rbldnsd: Please package version 0.995
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at unex.es
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
I've just uploaded rbldnsd 0.995 for unstable.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
