Your message dated Wed, 25 May 2005 04:02:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310640: fixed in cl-asdf 1.86-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 2005 22:29:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 24 15:29:53 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from postfix3-1.free.fr [213.228.0.44]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DahuL-0006Gu-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 15:29:53 -0700
Received: from arcanes.caniart.net (aqu33-4-82-233-52-145.fbx.proxad.net
[82.233.52.145])
by postfix3-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095E51734B3;
Wed, 25 May 2005 00:29:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from lymbes.caniart.net ([10.0.1.11])
by arcanes.caniart.net with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1DahuI-0003k3-B6; Wed, 25 May 2005 00:29:50 +0200
Received: from nicolas by lymbes.caniart.net with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Dahto-0005Fu-4H; Wed, 25 May 2005 00:29:20 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Nicolas CANIART <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 00:29:19 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 10.0.1.11
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cl-asdf: cl-mcclim package made unusable by the latest asdf package.
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:44:12 +0100)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on arcanes.caniart.net)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: cl-asdf
Version: 1.86-4
Severity: normal
The patch Peter Van Eynde applied on asdf.lisp in his latest release of
the asdf package rendered the mcclim package unusable.
(cf. cl-asdf_1.86-4.diff.gz on asdf qa page.)
There are two files named "package" in then scigraph defsystem. And
the recently applied patch causes an error to be raised in that case.
So mcclim is let partially loaded (only scigraph and the :mcclim package
def is missing).
The faulty file names are at lines 318, 328 in the mcclim.asd file.
The ennoying patch is at line 23 of the diff file and is inserted at
line 938 in the asdf.lisp file (from the cl-asdf package);
I quickly discuss the matter Milan Zamazal, the question is, is it really
necessary for file names to be unique ? I can't find documents about what may
(or may not) contain a defsystem.
If it is absolutely necessary, it will induce some change on the mcclim
package (and others ?), otherwise you should just remove the part of your
patch I previously mention.
Cordially,
Nicolas CANIART.
(I'm running a debian unstable with :
cl-mcclim 0.9.1-1
cl-asdf 1.86-4)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8)
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 310640-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2005 08:08:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 25 01:08:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Daqvw-0007Iq-00; Wed, 25 May 2005 01:08:08 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Daqq4-0006ku-00; Wed, 25 May 2005 04:02:04 -0400
From: Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#310640: fixed in cl-asdf 1.86-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 04:02:04 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: cl-asdf
Source-Version: 1.86-5
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
cl-asdf, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
cl-asdf_1.86-5.diff.gz
to pool/main/c/cl-asdf/cl-asdf_1.86-5.diff.gz
cl-asdf_1.86-5.dsc
to pool/main/c/cl-asdf/cl-asdf_1.86-5.dsc
cl-asdf_1.86-5_all.deb
to pool/main/c/cl-asdf/cl-asdf_1.86-5_all.deb
cl-cclan_1.86-5_all.deb
to pool/main/c/cl-asdf/cl-cclan_1.86-5_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated cl-asdf package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 08:22:17 +0200
Source: cl-asdf
Binary: cl-cclan cl-asdf
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.86-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
cl-asdf - Another System Definition Facility
cl-cclan - Comprehensive Common Lisp Archive Network
Closes: 310640
Changes:
cl-asdf (1.86-5) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Fixed duplicate components patch to better handle reloading
defsystem files. Now works again with McClim. Closes: #310640
* Corrected dependencies.
* Added postinst rebuild of all clc-enabled lisps so the new version
actually gets loaded.
Files:
5330dbec36d4e3dc1792c7b413d6a5a0 588 devel optional cl-asdf_1.86-5.dsc
4e9eab802184af9fa90c210e7427762a 18405 devel optional cl-asdf_1.86-5.diff.gz
45ce94fade8060f8e95727a43e4af7be 47254 devel optional cl-asdf_1.86-5_all.deb
42278b81bbfda5eb8119a6844932da75 19472 devel optional cl-cclan_1.86-5_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFClCG811ldN0tyliURAhR2AKCsb/mtH0UzhQKfXZvn5qH0hH6S6ACgxZYL
p/+ppbt+C5ZhkJmCc1ivWss=
=iSke
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
