Your message dated Thu, 30 Jun 2005 22:12:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line installation: Woody oldstable does not contain what was woody
stable.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jun 2005 11:25:14 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 30 04:25:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 82-44-188-242.cable.ubr06.haye.blueyonder.co.uk (debp)
[82.44.188.242]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DnxAQ-0008LJ-00; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 04:25:14 -0700
Received: from psb by debp with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DnxAP-0004o1-7f
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 12:25:13 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Paul Beardsell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: installation: Woody oldstable does not contain what was woody stable.
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 12:25:13 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation
Severity: important
I desperately need to configure a new box just like another one.
The other one runs stock standard woody. But the oldstable
archives do not contain all the woody packages! I am thus
being forced to upgrade to new stable sarge which would be
fine EXCEPT that there are some bugs in sarge which I am
busy tracking down and reporting.
In short: It should be possible to configure a woody
box by pointing sources.list only at oldstable. It is not.
(The following apt info has nothing to do with this issue - different box.)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (80, 'testing'), (60, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.18-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 316353-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jun 2005 20:12:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 30 13:12:09 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 220pc220.sshunet.nl (mordor.wolffelaar.nl) [145.97.220.220]
(Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Do5OL-0007RV-00; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 13:12:09 -0700
Received: from jeroen by mordor.wolffelaar.nl with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Do5OH-0001eP-BU; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 22:12:05 +0200
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 22:12:05 +0200
To: Paul Beardsell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: installation: Woody oldstable does not contain what was woody
stable.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 12:25:13PM +0100, Paul Beardsell wrote:
> I desperately need to configure a new box just like another one.
> The other one runs stock standard woody. But the oldstable
> archives do not contain all the woody packages! I am thus
> being forced to upgrade to new stable sarge which would be
> fine EXCEPT that there are some bugs in sarge which I am
> busy tracking down and reporting.
oldstable is a symlink pointing to 'woody', and the woody directory
didn't change at all with the sarge release (it even still calls woody
'stable', and not 'oldstable', see #312321).
> In short: It should be possible to configure a woody
> box by pointing sources.list only at oldstable. It is not.
If you insist that this is the case, please reopen this bug stating the
exact error message you've got and the mirror you're using.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 12:54:58PM +0100, Paul Beardsell wrote:
> Example of a now missing package from oldstable: libsql-statement-perl
http://packages.debian.org/libsql-statement-perl shows that the package
is in oldstable just fine.
I'm now closing this bug.
Thanks,
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
