Your message dated Fri, 28 Nov 2008 10:38:24 GMT
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ftm has been removed from Debian, closing #429699
has caused the Debian Bug report #429699,
regarding ftm depends on a development library
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
429699: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=429699
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftm
Version: 0.0.8
Severity: normal
Why does ftm depend on a development version of a library?
# dpkg -s ftm
Package: ftm
Version: 0.0.8
Depends: libabz0 (>= 0.6.2), libc6 (>= 2.3.6-6), libdebug0 (>= 0.4.2),
libncurses5 (>= 5.4-5), libabz0-dev (>= 0.7.2)
Also depending on different versions of libabz0 (>= 0.6.2)
and libabz0-dev (>= 0.7.2) does not look very consistent.
Uwe
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (850, 'stable'), (750, 'testing'), (650, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages ftm depends on:
ii libabz0 0.7.2 Miscellaneous useful routines
ii libabz0-dev 0.7.2 Development files for the abz libr
ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libdebug0 0.4.2 Memory leak detection system and l
ii libncurses5 5.5-5 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ftm recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.0.8+rm
The ftm package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/506810 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Marco Rodrigues
http://Marco.Tondela.org
--- End Message ---
