Your message dated Fri, 28 Nov 2008 10:30:05 GMT
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line axyl has been removed from Debian, closing #506609
has caused the Debian Bug report #506609,
regarding axyl: code copy of Xinha ships the ImageManager plugin released under
the PHP 2.02 licence
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
506609: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506609
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: axyl
Version: 2.9.1
Severity: important
[-legal and ftpmaster CC'ed]
Hi,
The following files are released under the problematic PHP 2.02 licence:
(/usr/share/axyl/lib/js/xinha/plugins/ImageManager/)
Classes/Transform.php
Classes/GD.php
Classes/IM.php
Classes/NetPBM.php
and they aren't mentioned in the copyright file either.
-legal: can a final concensus be reached on whether this licence is DFSG-free?
ftp-master: can we finally have some comment on this license issue (and the
lintian check)? Some packages have been rejected in the past because they are
released under the terms of the PHP license: but what about those currently
in the archive?
It would be great so that a final severity, wording, and references can be
used for the lintian check (see #498875, also CC'ed).
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.9.1+rm
The axyl package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/506624 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Marco Rodrigues
http://Marco.Tondela.org
--- End Message ---
