Your message dated Sat, 27 Dec 2008 10:15:13 GMT
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line waproamd has been removed from Debian, closing #412384
has caused the Debian Bug report #412384,
regarding waproamd is superseded by wpa_supplicant
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
412384: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=412384
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: waproamd
Version: 0.6-7.1
Severity: normal
According to http://0pointer.de/lennart/projects/waproamd/ waproamd
should no longer be used.
"waproamd is obsolete, please use wpa_supplicant instead. waproamd
contains some race conditions that are impossible to fix. wpa_supplicant
supersedes waproamd in almost every way."
But the debian package does not show this warning in the package
description, man page or any other documentation I've found.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.19
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages waproamd depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.11 Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libdaemon0 0.10-1 lightweight C library for daemons
waproamd recommends no packages.
-- debconf information excluded
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.6-9+rm
The waproamd package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/509389 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Marco Rodrigues
http://Marco.Tondela.org
--- End Message ---
