Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2005 07:02:55 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#284530: fixed in rubber 1.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Dec 2004 23:38:56 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 06 15:38:56 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from reidster.net [208.42.95.155]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CbSRF-0007VI-00; Mon, 06 Dec 2004 15:38:41 -0800
Received: from reid by reidster.net with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CbSQI-0000il-0t; Mon, 06 Dec 2004 17:37:42 -0600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Reid Priedhorsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: "rubber --ps report.tex" fails when "rubber: paper letter" directive
exists
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 17:37:41 -0600
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: rubber
Version: 0.99.8-1
Severity: normal
Hello,
The directive "paper" does not seem to be working properly. In my LaTeX file,
I have the following line:
% rubber: paper letter
According to the man page:
paper <options>
Specify options related to paper size. Currently they are used
to give -t options to dvips and -p options to dvipdfm.
But, rubber gives dvips "letter" via -p rather than -t:
executing: dvips -o report.ps report.dvi -p letter
which dvips complains about ("dvips: ! Bad first page option (-p letter).").
I can work around it with directive "rubber: dvips.options -t letter", which
works as expected:
executing: dvips -t letter -o report.ps report.dvi
Thanks for your time. Looks like a very useful package.
Reid
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.28
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages rubber depends on:
ii python 2.3.4-4 An interactive high-level object-o
ii tetex-bin 2.0.2-23 The teTeX binary files
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 284530-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jul 2005 11:18:14 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 13 04:18:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DsfFm-00085C-00; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 04:18:14 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dsf0x-0000g3-00; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 07:02:55 -0400
From: Emmanuel Beffara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#284530: fixed in rubber 1.0-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 07:02:55 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4
Source: rubber
Source-Version: 1.0-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rubber, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
rubber_1.0-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/r/rubber/rubber_1.0-1.diff.gz
rubber_1.0-1.dsc
to pool/main/r/rubber/rubber_1.0-1.dsc
rubber_1.0-1_all.deb
to pool/main/r/rubber/rubber_1.0-1_all.deb
rubber_1.0.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/rubber/rubber_1.0.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Emmanuel Beffara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated rubber package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:52:35 +0200
Source: rubber
Binary: rubber
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Emmanuel Beffara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Emmanuel Beffara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
rubber - an automated system for building LaTeX documents
Closes: 190554 278453 283448 284530 316548 317445
Changes:
rubber (1.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New release.
* Various bugfixes (closes: #278453, #317445).
* New system for detecting graphics conversion rules (closes: #283448).
* Fixed the command line for some external tools (closes: #284530, #316548).
* Some new command-line switches (closes: #190554).
Files:
4041e1ec186b95061e86cb1ac6de0ef4 632 tex optional rubber_1.0-1.dsc
0b28fb8d7125491f41995b225f2f5d33 76218 tex optional rubber_1.0.orig.tar.gz
8f166c5e492485e51950ced8abd3decc 3459 tex optional rubber_1.0-1.diff.gz
46431bccb80e48fc8fc6a093a6ab9aaa 75642 tex optional rubber_1.0-1_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFC1O8ZHCar6qtHRZgRAktQAKDGDon8D7TLlCGpwmwEL26xz4CuNgCgyzxK
xFqDuziemllvomuXxmVDlCM=
=3772
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
