Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2005 21:22:46 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301627: gnupg: Default key signing level change causes
confusion
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Mar 2005 10:13:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 27 02:13:45 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp12.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.20]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DFUm9-0005I9-00; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 02:13:45 -0800
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (unknown [127.0.0.1])
by mwinf1201.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id C7DA01C000C0
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 12:13:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ALille-251-1-14-196.w82-127.abo.wanadoo.fr
(ALille-251-1-14-196.w82-127.abo.wanadoo.fr [82.127.156.196])
by mwinf1201.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 81EFD1C000BC;
Sun, 27 Mar 2005 12:13:13 +0200 (CEST)
X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from 192.168.1.64 by charlie.simphalempin.com with esmtp
(masqmail 0.2.20) id 1DFUld-0k5-00; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 12:13:13 +0200
Received: from remi by auguste.simphalempin.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1
(Debian))
id 1DFUlj-0001CZ-00; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 12:13:19 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: =?utf-8?q?R=C3=A9mi_Denis-Courmont?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gnupg: Default key signing level change causes confusion
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 12:13:19 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_DSBL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: gnupg
Version: 1.4.0-3
Severity: important
Hello,
It seems that as of version 1.4.0, gnupg does no longer ask for the
certification level when signing someone else's key, whereas earlier
versions did.
That causes a lot of confusion, particularly after keysigning party.
Many unsuspecting users end up making "sig 0" signatures instead of
"sig 2" or "sig 3".
I think the "ask-cert-level" option should really be re-enabled by
default.
Sincerely,
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.5
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages gnupg depends on:
ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.2-5 high-quality block-sorting file co
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libldap2 2.1.30-3 OpenLDAP libraries
ii libreadline5 5.0-10 GNU readline and history libraries
ii libusb-0.1-4 2:0.1.10a-7 userspace USB programming library
ii makedev 2.3.1-77 creates device files in /dev
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 301627-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jul 2005 19:57:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 13 12:57:50 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from warp.os9.nl [145.99.250.222]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DsnMc-000117-00; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 12:57:50 -0700
Received: from darwin.os9.nl (darwin.os9.nl [145.99.250.219])
by warp.os9.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADFFDE6A8C
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 21:57:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by darwin.os9.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id D379E13925; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 21:57:48 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: Bug#301627: gnupg: Default key signing level change causes
confusion
From: Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-CsOHjmGuJ6uC0ClUKQTn"
Organization: Squirrelmail Development Team
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 21:22:46 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--=-CsOHjmGuJ6uC0ClUKQTn
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> > I think the "ask-cert-level" option should really be re-enabled by
> > default.
>=20
> We changed this on purpose.
Since this change was intentional, I'm closing this bug.
Thijs
--=-CsOHjmGuJ6uC0ClUKQTn
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBC1WoGJdKMxZV9WM8RAte8AJ4t08ZPwRLrkJ1kb5mEJkxxGE8a1wCgn1Um
t7b+KBm9RQwz5/986UVqTOU=
=IILE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-CsOHjmGuJ6uC0ClUKQTn--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
