Your message dated Sun, 6 Dec 2009 14:24:47 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Fixed in gnurobbo 0.62+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #553911,
regarding gnurobbo: Source contains non-free fonts
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
553911: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=553911
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gnurobbo
Version: 0.62-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3


Hi,

Upstream introduced a new font in version 0.62; unfortunately this
font is non-free. The binaries built by 0.62-1 strip out the font
(replacing it with a link to DejaVu fonts), but the files should also
be stripped from the source archive.

Note that this bug is fixed by 0.62+dfsg-1 which is available on
mentors and is awaiting a sponsor.

Regards,

Stephen

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (200, 'unstable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages gnurobbo depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.9-25     GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libsdl-ttf2.0-0               2.0.9-1    ttf library for Simple DirectMedia
ii  libsdl1.2debian               1.2.13-5   Simple DirectMedia Layer
ii  ttf-dejavu-extra              2.30-1     Vera font family derivate with add

gnurobbo recommends no packages.

gnurobbo suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This bug was fixed in +dfsg-1, and ths fix is included in +dfsg-2
which has just been sponsored to unstable.

Regards,

Stephen


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to