Your message dated Mon, 1 Mar 2010 09:40:14 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #571673,
regarding upstream pvrg-jpeg-etb.patch seems to differ from debian's
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
571673: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=571673
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: pvrg-jpeg
Version: 1.2.1+dfsg1-1
Severity: minor
Hi.
The upstream version of pvrg-jpeg-etb.patch
(http://www.panix.com/~eli/jpeg/pvrg-jpeg-etb.patch.gz) seems to
differ from what is shipped with Debian,... is this an accident or
could you please explain why?
Cheers,
Chris
*** Please type your report below this line ***
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-heisenberg (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages pvrg-jpeg depends on:
ii libc6 2.10.2-6 Embedded GNU C Library:
Shared lib
pvrg-jpeg recommends no packages.
Versions of packages pvrg-jpeg suggests:
ii libjpeg-progs 8-2.1 Programs for manipulating
JPEG fil
ii netpbm 2:10.0-12.1 Graphics conversion tools between
-- no debconf information
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
--- End Message ---
