Your message dated Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:09:45 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323658: debhelper: Improper copyright file
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2005 19:58:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 17 12:58:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.55]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E5U3Q-0005SG-00; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 12:58:28 -0700
Received: from andromeda (cpe-69-202-136-66.twcny.res.rr.com [69.202.136.66])
by ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
j7HJwQDX007650
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:58:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pryzbyj by andromeda with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E5U3N-0005YQ-0A
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:58:25 -0400
Subject: debhelper: Improper copyright file
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 0.6.90)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:58:25 -0400
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: debhelper
Version: 0.2.15.9-2
Severity: normal
File: /usr/share/doc/debhelper/copyright
The copyright file doesn't list the copyright holder, but instead says
something of the form: "Copyright: GPL". Please don't confuse the
copyright holder and the license.
See this thread:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/03/msg02190.html
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 323658-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2005 23:09:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 17 16:09:44 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E5X2W-00081u-00; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 16:09:44 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (cpe-66-207-84-92.wb.hsw.ntelos.net
[66.207.84.92])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44B7D17FA1
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 23:09:42 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 606C36E089; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:09:46 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:09:45 -0400
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#323658: debhelper: Improper copyright file
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Justin Pryzby wrote:
> The copyright file doesn't list the copyright holder, but instead says
> something of the form: "Copyright: GPL". Please don't confuse the
> copyright holder and the license.
I don't know what copyright file you're reading, but it's not the
current one.
This may have something to do with the fact that "0.2.15.9-2" is not a
version of debhelper that was ever released, and bears not the least
resemblence to any debhelper version number ever.
--=20
see shy jo
--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDA8O5d8HHehbQuO8RAiv8AJ979vhy5KM5tZ3mCSA7Af3lcPP90QCgsRWh
+gUEX8ZuzJaxjgjaMRfHCo8=
=24jK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
