Your message dated Sun, 4 Sep 2005 11:10:01 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Grrrr
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Apr 2005 12:49:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 27 05:49:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gateway.bzzware.org [212.125.240.90]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DQlz4-0001yB-00; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 05:49:42 -0700
Received: from tunet.bzzware.org ([192.168.12.3] helo=fajx300.bzzware.org)
by gateway.bzzware.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1DQlxt-0007Py-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 14:48:29 +0200
Received: by fajx300.bzzware.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 08623103E7; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 14:47:57 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Finn-Arne Johansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: nbd-server: fails to server multiple clients
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 14:47:57 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: nbd-server
Version: 2.7.3-1
Severity: normal
I have a setup with lessdisks clients set up as workstations for
debian-edu. We uses normal debian-kernels (2.4.27-2-386 on the clients and
2.4.27-2-686-smp no the server). The clients all have about 256 MB memory,
en this is enough in most tasks. However - the users low to play with big
files in OpenOffice - and they are all saved as MSOffice fileformat. One
typical example is a powerpoint presentation with some photos. The
presentations typically are >> 20MB, the biggest We've foudn is 102MB (!!)
ok - let set up swap over nbd.
I Tested this on a small basis first manually set up 2 clients and 2
swapfiles, and the swapfiles got their name as
/var/lib/lessdisks/swap/swapfile.<IP>
the first client connected fine, and now the users were able to
open their nice litte (?) presentations.
OK lets try to automate this then.
I enabled the setup using /etc/nbd-server on the server, and
/etc/nbd-client on the client.
I rebooted the next server, and everything went well.
Then I tried to reboot 9 other clients. They all seemed to end up
in a deadlock. I had to have someone reboot them after I moved the
/etc/nbd-client away.
I also tried to set up nbd-server using inetd, but then nothing
happened. Not really sure why.
So my questions is then maybe more like:
- It should be possible to use multiple clients against one server,
shouldn't it ?
- It should be possible to use inetd to server the clients ?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-x300
Locale: LANG=nb_NO, LC_CTYPE=nb_NO (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages nbd-server depends on:
ii debconf 1.4.30.11 Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 306559-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 09:10:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 02:10:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from poros.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.44]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBqVo-00037q-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 02:10:04 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 908CE3BC34E
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 11:10:03 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from western.grep.be (dD5E0678D.access.telenet.be [213.224.103.141])
by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 805603BC2EA
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 11:10:03 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from [2001:6f8:32f:20:20d:93ff:fe34:e5c4] (helo=grep.be)
by western.grep.be with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EBqVn-0005np-4b
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
message size 822; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 11:10:03 +0200
Received: from wouter by grep.be with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EBqVl-0003BX-3P
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 11:10:01 +0200
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 11:10:01 +0200
From: Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Grrrr
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Speed: Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
Organization: The Debian Project, http://www.debian.org/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
Sender: "Wouter Verhelst,,," <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,ONEWORD
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: nbd-server
Version: 2.7.3-3
Mark the *right* version, rather than a non-existing one. Grmbl.
--
The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the
pavement is precisely one bananosecond
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
