Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 09:55:55 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#253002: hugs98: FTBFS on amd64.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jun 2004 14:02:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 06 07:02:51 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from astra.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.58] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BWyEd-0000Ql-00; Sun, 06 Jun 2004 07:02:51 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
        by astra.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id CDE7A388096
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun,  6 Jun 2004 16:02:48 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from kabel.telenet.be (D5E08CEF.kabel.telenet.be [213.224.140.239])
        by astra.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA67388071
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun,  6 Jun 2004 16:02:47 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by kabel.telenet.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
        id D8C6526136; Sun, 06 Jun 2004 16:02:31 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 16:02:31 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: hugs98: FTBFS on amd64.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


--PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: hugs98
Version: 98.200311-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch

It fails to build on amd64 because it's not using -fPIC to create
a shared lib.  I've attached a patch that turns it on.


Kurt


--PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="hugs98-amd64.patch"

--- debian/rules.orig   2004-06-06 15:56:39.538610907 +0200
+++ debian/rules        2004-06-06 15:56:52.834239659 +0200
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
        cp src/unix/config.guess src/unix/config.guess.old
        cp /usr/share/misc/config.sub src/unix
        cp /usr/share/misc/config.guess src/unix
-       cd src/unix && CFLAGS="-g -Wall" ./configure --prefix=/usr 
--mandir=/usr/share/man $(DEBUG_OPT)
+       cd src/unix && CFLAGS="-g -Wall -fPIC" ./configure --prefix=/usr 
--mandir=/usr/share/man $(DEBUG_OPT)
        touch $@
 
 binary: binary-arch binary-indep

--PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 253002-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 09:01:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 02:01:20 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from s2.ukfsn.org (mail.ukfsn.org) [217.158.120.143] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EBqNM-0003RQ-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 02:01:20 -0700
Received: from hardknott.home.whinlatter.ukfsn.org 
(dsl-88-104-47-197.access.as9105.com [88.104.47.197])
        by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id DB870E6E69; Sun,  4 Sep 2005 10:00:39 +0100 (BST)
Received: from rleigh by hardknott.home.whinlatter.ukfsn.org with local (Exim 
4.52)
        id 1EBqI7-0001cB-1p; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 09:55:55 +0100
From: Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Isaac Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#253002: hugs98: FTBFS on amd64.
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 09:55:55 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Version: 98.200503.08-2

Isaac Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Has any progress been made on this yet?  amd64 will be entering the
>> archive soon, at which point this will become a serious bug.
>>
>> It's also worth pushing upstream--they may want to integrate this
>> (-fPIC) in their build since it will affect all amd64 users.
>> Alternatively, they could use libtool.
>
> Greetings.  The debian/rules file has had -fPIC in the CFLAGS since at
> least the last upload.  Can you check whether it will build out-of-box
> for amd64 now?

I tested on pergolesi.debian.org in its sid_amd64_pure_ chroot (I
don't have an amd64 myself).  It built just fine, so I'll close the
bug with this message.


Regards,
Roger

- -- 
Roger Leigh
                Printing on GNU/Linux?  http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
                Debian GNU/Linux        http://www.debian.org/
                GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848.  Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQFDGraZVcFcaSW/uEgRAiRoAJ4vPT5SehjkRDJPBfDqnL5JWWor6gCeIh3E
S6PidT+2KuNWHbxjcn20MZM=
=epYT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to