Your message dated Mon, 03 Jan 2011 12:02:11 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#608746: etherboot: switch to ipxe?
has caused the Debian Bug report #608746,
regarding etherboot: switch to ipxe?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
608746: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608746
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: etherboot
Version: 5.4.4-8
Severity: wishlist
Are there any plans to switch to the ipxe codebase or will the
etherboot Debian package stay based on the etherboot/gpxe code for
the foreseeable future (so people might consider packaging ipxe
independent from the etherboot package)?
See http://git.ipxe.org/ipxe.git/commit/8406115 and
http://ipxe.org/faq#how_does_ipxe_relate_to_gpxe_and_etherboot
for further details.
regards,
-mika-
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
retitle 474034 ITP: ipxe -- PXE network bootloader for x86 PCs
thanks
On 01/03/2011 11:51 AM, Michael Prokop wrote:
> Are there any plans to switch to the ipxe codebase or will the
> etherboot Debian package stay based on the etherboot/gpxe code for
> the foreseeable future (so people might consider packaging ipxe
> independent from the etherboot package)?
ipxe is packaged seperately, replacing etherboot for wheezy, see #474034
for progress. now that new processing seems working again, i'll catch up
with it after my vac.
--
Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [email protected]
Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/
--- End Message ---
