Your message dated Sun, 19 Jun 2011 02:48:14 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#533601: [sparc] tcpd fails reverse name resolution
has caused the Debian Bug report #533601,
regarding [sparc] tcpd fails reverse name resolution
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
533601: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=533601
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: tcpd
Version: 7.6.q-16
Severity: important


I woundered why the following line in hosts.allow didn't work:

  in.tftpd: .iwr.uni-heidelberg.de

debuging with the line:

  in.tftpd: ALL: aclexec /tmp/test %c %h %n

yield the expanded args:

 129.206.104.80 129.206.104.80 unknown

which shows, that reverse name resolution fails somehow.

sshd (which is linked against the libwrap library) access control works.

Thanks,
  Hermann

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.1
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: sparc (sparc64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-sparc64-smp (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages tcpd depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]         1.5.24     Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6                         2.7-18     GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libwrap0                      7.6.q-16   Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra

tcpd recommends no packages.

tcpd suggests no packages.

-- debconf information:
  tcpd/paranoid-mode: false



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Apr 16, Marco d'Itri <[email protected]> wrote:

> Are there any news about this old bug? Can you still reproduce it?
Closing.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to