Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 20:16:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329107: Bad Handling of .gz Files
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 16:10:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 19 09:10:32 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx2.magma.ca [206.191.0.250]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EHODw-0000fk-00; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 09:10:32 -0700
Received: from mail2.magma.ca (mail2.magma.ca [206.191.0.214])
by mx2.magma.ca (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j8JGAUfM026548
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 12:10:31 -0400
Received: from ottgate.precidia.com (ottgate.precidia.com [206.191.32.162])
by mail2.magma.ca (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j8JGATOO031807
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 12:10:30 -0400
Received: from tolkien.ott.precidia.com [10.0.1.2] (mail)
by ottgate.precidia.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1EHODt-0005GO-00; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 12:10:29 -0400
Received: from anchorage.ott.precidia.com [10.0.2.73] (bcwhite)
by tolkien.ott.precidia.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1EHODr-0008J1-00; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 12:10:27 -0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 12:10:26 -0400
From: Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Precidia Technologies http://www.precidia.com/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050513
Debian/1.7.8-1
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bad Handling of .gz Files
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: toolchain-source
Version: 3.4-5
Severity: minor
I noticed while starting a tpkg-make the following:
case gcc-3.4.3.tar.bz2 in \
*.bz2) tar -x --bzip2 -f gcc-3.4.3.tar.bz2;; \
*.gz) tar -x --gzip -f gcc-3.4.3.tar.bz2;; \
*) false; \
esac
Note that the .gz line is still unpacking a .bz2 file. This doesn't
seem to affect the current operation, but thought you would like to know.
Brian
( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Differences are good. If two people agree, one of them is redundant.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 329107-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 18:17:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 19 11:17:21 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from qproxy.gmail.com [72.14.204.201]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EHQCf-0002OA-00; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 11:17:21 -0700
Received: by qproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id c8so177100qbc
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 11:16:50 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=NLoIwa05ZyfLAV8n/UXOrmPmKqvbni0V6MOxAHzwr53bt7hGdFZYSmx5KV3gS84/FQB/jffZJjjRWmDq/qGLpB2YIPGwGp6Zx062KYJe4TI0YHRwLfwCegeahei6FC/xdHd2f0NaSm44AKg9RIeOAAIbEs3c0BsdyR+VNci4TzQ=
Received: by 10.65.81.3 with SMTP id i3mr51955qbl;
Mon, 19 Sep 2005 11:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.65.126.2 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 11:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 20:16:49 +0200
From: Hakan Ardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Hakan Ardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#329107: Bad Handling of .gz Files
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Hi,
this looks bad as make has already evaled the variables, but is
actually correct, check out the Makefile.
On 9/19/05, Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: toolchain-source
> Version: 3.4-5
> Severity: minor
>=20
> I noticed while starting a tpkg-make the following:
>=20
> case gcc-3.4.3.tar.bz2 in \
> *.bz2) tar -x --bzip2 -f gcc-3.4.3.tar.bz2;; \
> *.gz) tar -x --gzip -f gcc-3.4.3.tar.bz2;; \
> *) false; \
> esac
>=20
> Note that the .gz line is still unpacking a .bz2 file. This doesn't
> seem to affect the current operation, but thought you would like to know.
>=20
> Brian
> ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------=
------
> Differences are good. If two people agree, one of them is redundan=
t.
>=20
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
