Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 21:31:02 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not a bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2005 18:04:06 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 11 11:04:06 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cpc3-cmbg5-3-0-cust37.cmbg.cable.ntl.com (cardinal)
[81.104.194.37]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EEWBR-0006EF-00; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 11:04:06 -0700
Received: from warwick by cardinal with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1EEWFV-0001Lo-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 19:08:17 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Tim Baverstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xscreensaver: Run hacks by name from command-line, not by index.
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 19:08:17 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Tim Baverstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: xscreensaver
Version: 4.21-3
Severity: wishlist
It would be nice to be able to say:
xscreensaver-command -demo carousel
instead of
xscreensaver-command -demo 239 (or whatever number carousel is)
At the very least, have
xscreensaver-command -list | grep carousel
show something like
239: carousel -root -some other parameters
It seems arcane to expect someone to look up the index for a hack by
scanning the (unfriendly) .xscreensavers file, for running hacks from
the command-line, when they have perfectly good names associated with
them.
I know there's the screensaver-demo command, but I rather like the
carousel as an application in and of itself.
Cheers,
Tim Baverstock
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.18.20050910bmem
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages xscreensaver depends on:
ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libglade2-0 1:2.4.2-2 library to load .glade files at ru
ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.4-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.4-3 The GTK+ graphical user interface
ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii libjpeg62 6b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG
ii libpam0g 0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio
ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System Session Management
ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System protocol client li
ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii libxml2 2.6.16-7 GNOME XML library
ii libxmu6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System miscellaneous util
ii libxpm4 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X pixmap library
ii libxrandr2 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System Resize, Rotate and
ii libxrender1 0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client libra
ii libxt6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4.sarge.2 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 327720-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 19:31:11 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 19 12:31:11 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.charite.de [160.45.207.131]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EHRM6-0003rg-00; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 12:31:11 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.charite.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8328168704
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 21:31:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.charite.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mail.charite.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025)
with ESMTP id 05645-08 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Mon, 19 Sep 2005 21:31:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from postamt.charite.de (postamt.charite.de [160.45.207.132])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
by mail.charite.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E9E63B412
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 21:31:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by postamt.charite.de (Postfix, from userid 7945)
id E220E2209F3; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 21:31:02 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 21:31:02 +0200
From: Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Not a bug
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at charite.de
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
/usr/lib/xscreensaver/<nameofhack>
--=20
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
de
Charite - Universit=E4tsmedizin Berlin Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570=
-155
Gemeinsame Einrichtung von FU- und HU-Berlin Fax. +49 (0)30-450 570-9=
62
IT-Zentrum Standort CBF send no mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
