Your message dated Sun, 2 Oct 2005 04:51:45 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libpam-modules: pam_userdb should work with crypt()-ed
passwords
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 May 2003 13:39:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 21 08:39:11 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bunny.shuttle.de [193.174.247.132]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19IToF-0006nX-00; Wed, 21 May 2003 08:39:11 -0500
Received: by bunny.shuttle.de (Postfix, from userid 112)
id 3BF5F4E571; Wed, 21 May 2003 15:39:10 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Raoul Borenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libpam-modules: pam_userdb should work with crypt()-ed passwords
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 15:39:10 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_20
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: libpam-modules
Version: 0.76-9
Severity: wishlist
Tags: security upstream patch
a patch can be found at
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/pam-list/2000-01/att-0080/01-userdb-crypt.patch
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bunny 2.4.20-1-686 #1 Sat Mar 22 13:16:21 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE
Versions of packages libpam-modules depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libcap1 1:1.10-12 support for getting/setting POSIX.
ii libdb3 3.2.9-17 Berkeley v3 Database Libraries [ru
ii libpam0g 0.76-9 Pluggable Authentication Modules l
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 194173-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Oct 2005 11:51:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 02 04:51:45 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (tennyson.dodds.net)
[66.93.39.86]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EM2Nd-000629-00; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 04:51:45 -0700
Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id CDE1C7045; Sun, 2 Oct 2005 04:51:45 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2005 04:51:45 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: libpam-modules: pam_userdb should work with crypt()-ed passwords
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MAH+hnPXVZWQ5cD/"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--MAH+hnPXVZWQ5cD/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Version: 0.79-1
With the inclusion of Linux-PAM 0.79 in unstable, pam_userdb does now
support crypt()ed passwords.
Cheers,
--=20
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--MAH+hnPXVZWQ5cD/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDP8nRKN6ufymYLloRAq6mAKCa82R+LyuR0BjLfpjlnBKIgrtYoQCg06jz
GQC9mKSPcpwhdGldWvJJQ9w=
=IkTu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--MAH+hnPXVZWQ5cD/--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
