Your message dated Sun, 2 Oct 2005 14:04:54 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#331217: moin: wrong upstream-version
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Oct 2005 11:39:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 02 04:39:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from shadowland.snow-crash.org (ned.snow-crash.org) [80.190.250.253]
(postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EM2CF-0004jY-00; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 04:39:59 -0700
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p508E07EA.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.142.7.234])
by ned.snow-crash.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8713335A3;
Sun, 2 Oct 2005 13:39:57 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Steffen Joeris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: moin: wrong upstream-version
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2005 13:50:59 +0000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: moin
Severity: minor
Hi Jonas
Sorry me again ;=)
I know that the moinmoin developers are a little bit confused about the
version number.
The upstream version is 1.3.5rc1 and not 1.3.4.really.1.3.5rc1-1 .
Please correct it and use the upstream versions, this is a wish from the
upstream ;=)
Thx
Greetings
Steffen
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (700, 'unstable'), (600, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-kanotix-11
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 331217-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Oct 2005 12:06:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 02 05:06:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 0x3ef3a55b.virnxx2.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk (xayide.jones.dk)
[62.243.165.91]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EM2bS-0001N2-00; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 05:06:02 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by xayide.jones.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id D91E411B9B5
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 2 Oct 2005 14:05:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from xayide.jones.dk ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (xayide.jones.dk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with SMTP id 12527-05 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sun, 2 Oct 2005 14:05:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [192.168.102.178])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by xayide.jones.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8881811B97A
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 2 Oct 2005 14:05:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from auryn.jones.dk (auryn.jones.dk [127.0.0.1])
by localhost.localdomain (Postfix) with SMTP id F1B9E33AC7;
Sun, 2 Oct 2005 14:04:54 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2005 14:04:54 +0200
From: Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Steffen Joeris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#331217: moin: wrong upstream-version
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Spiff ApS
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.1 (GTK+ 2.6.10; powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu)
X-Face: yvw#o~hz'%$;u|iUBohl)T/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]/j&/v4H;'#{E\]pJHQsA0!FKs"='cNj!x=\]NiEsi
PWi#:wS|bY F]0)w+?QXNQi={<6HVU5(98,?_#=d!$YOQ"9Vc%Ax-!?lWZUMj7y}m
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at jones.dk
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 13:50:59 +0000
Steffen Joeris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: moin
> Severity: minor
>=20
>=20
> Hi Jonas
> Sorry me again ;=3D)
> I know that the moinmoin developers are a little bit confused about
> the version number.
> The upstream version is 1.3.5rc1 and not 1.3.4.really.1.3.5rc1-1 .
> Please correct it and use the upstream versions, this is a wish from
> the upstream ;=3D)
If I added a package to the archive with the version "1.3.5rc1" then
such version number would technically be greater than "1.3.5".
I chose to use an odd version number for the release candidate in order
to avoid being forced to use an odd number for the final release.
Examples of versions being greater than "1.3.5rc1" are
"1.3.5s" and "1:1.3.5".
Also, I cannot rename a version already in the archive.
Off course what should be done is package the final 1.3.5, but similar
situation may occur in the future, and I will most probably choose same
naming scheme.
I dare close this bugreport as it is not really a bug but a wishlist
item, and one that cannot sanely be fulfilled.
- Jonas
- --=20
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
- Enden er n=E6r: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDP8zmn7DbMsAkQLgRAmadAJwNlAL3RTLyCvc4eRfvP2TGfopUrgCgitwU
Qkc9iIiRNjBFU+D9l2s6rDo=3D
=3Da3vL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
