Your message dated Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:40:15 +0930
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329072: mingw32-binutils bug 329072 still occurs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 11:13:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 19 04:13:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vscan01.westnet.com.au [203.10.1.131]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EHJa8-0008JU-00; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 04:13:08 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E3E67605A8
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 19:12:36 +0800 (WST)
Received: from vscan01.westnet.com.au ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (vscan01.westnet.com.au [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 13651-12 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Mon, 19 Sep 2005 19:12:36 +0800 (WST)
Received: from dsl-202-72-168-241.wa.westnet.com.au
(dsl-202-72-168-241.wa.westnet.com.au [202.72.168.241])
by vscan01.westnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0200F760D72
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 19:12:34 +0800 (WST)
Subject: mingw32-binutils: FTBFS (i386/gcc-4.0): PACKAGE undeclared
From: Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17
X-Mutt-Fcc:
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-1g/lerjwNZZuT1C8YR+p"
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 19:12:32 +0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--=-1g/lerjwNZZuT1C8YR+p
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: mingw32-binutils
Version: 2.15.94-20050118.1-1
Severity: important
Justification: fails to build from source
mingw32-binutils FTBFS in gcc 4 with the following error. Defining
PACKAGE in build_dir/objs/intl/config.h fixed it. My autotools-foo isn't
up to scratch, or I would suggest a patch.
make[4]: Entering directory `/home/pabs/devel/debian/qa/mingw32-binutils-2.=
15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/objs/bfd'
rm -f bfd-tmp.h
cp bfd-in3.h bfd-tmp.h
/bin/sh /home/pabs/devel/debian/qa/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/buil=
d_dir/src/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/bfd/../move-if-change bfd-tmp.h=20
bfd.h
rm -f bfd-tmp.h
touch stmp-bfd-h
/bin/sh ./libtool --mode=3Dcompile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.=20
-I/home/pabs/devel/debian/qa/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/=
src/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/bfd -I. -D_GNU_SOURCE -I.=20
-I/home/pabs/devel/debian/qa/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/=
src/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/bfd=20
-I/home/pabs/devel/debian/qa/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/=
src/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/bfd/../include =20
-I/home/pabs/devel/debian/qa/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/=
src/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/bfd/../intl -I../intl -W -Wall=20
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -g -O2 -c -o archive.lo=20
/home/pabs/devel/debian/qa/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/sr=
c/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/bfd/archive.c
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/home/pabs/devel/debian/qa/mingw32-binutils-2.15.=
94-20050118.1/build_dir/src/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/bfd -I.=20
-D_GNU_SOURCE -I. -I/home/pabs/devel/debian/qa/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-200=
50118.1/build_dir/src/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/bfd=20
-I/home/pabs/devel/debian/qa/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/=
src/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/bfd/../include=20
-I/home/pabs/devel/debian/qa/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/=
src/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/bfd/../intl -I../intl -W -Wall=20
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -g -O2 -c=20
/home/pabs/devel/debian/qa/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/sr=
c/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/bfd/archive.c -o archive.o
/home/pabs/devel/debian/qa/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/sr=
c/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/bfd/archive.c: In function=20
'get_extended_arelt_filename':
/home/pabs/devel/debian/qa/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/sr=
c/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/bfd/archive.c:304: warning: implicit=20
declaration of function 'strtol'
/home/pabs/devel/debian/qa/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/sr=
c/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/bfd/archive.c: In function=20
'_bfd_generic_read_ar_hdr_mag':
/home/pabs/devel/debian/qa/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/sr=
c/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/bfd/archive.c:388: warning: implicit=20
declaration of function 'atoi'
/home/pabs/devel/debian/qa/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/sr=
c/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/bfd/archive.c: In function=20
'_bfd_write_archive_contents':
/home/pabs/devel/debian/qa/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/sr=
c/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/bfd/archive.c:1759: error: 'PACKAGE'=20
undeclared (first use in this function)
/home/pabs/devel/debian/qa/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/sr=
c/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/bfd/archive.c:1759: error: (Each undeclared=20
identifier is reported only once
/home/pabs/devel/debian/qa/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/sr=
c/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/bfd/archive.c:1759: error: for each function=20
it appears in.)
/home/pabs/devel/debian/qa/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/sr=
c/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/bfd/archive.c: In function=20
'_bfd_compute_and_write_armap':
/home/pabs/devel/debian/qa/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/sr=
c/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/bfd/archive.c:1826: warning: implicit=20
declaration of function 'free'
/home/pabs/devel/debian/qa/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/sr=
c/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/bfd/archive.c: In function=20
'_bfd_archive_bsd_update_armap_timestamp':
/home/pabs/devel/debian/qa/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/sr=
c/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/bfd/archive.c:2022: error: 'PACKAGE'=20
undeclared (first use in this function)
make[4]: *** [archive.lo] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/pabs/devel/debian/qa/mingw32-binutils-2.1=
5.94-20050118.1/build_dir/objs/bfd'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/pabs/devel/debian/qa/mingw32-binutils-2.1=
5.94-20050118.1/build_dir/objs/bfd'
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/pabs/devel/debian/qa/mingw32-binutils-2.1=
5.94-20050118.1/build_dir/objs/bfd'
make[1]: *** [all-bfd] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/pabs/devel/debian/qa/mingw32-binutils-2.1=
5.94-20050118.1/build_dir/objs'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: LANG=3Den_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Den_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8)
Versions of packages mingw32-binutils depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared librarie=
s an
--=20
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--=-1g/lerjwNZZuT1C8YR+p
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBDLp0g5Sc9mGvjxCMRAsW5AJ0QNX9wB3GOz9vdkBEtMLEciktlYgCgrAQf
r0rjcGXnTGdbnLJOZDOlW+c=
=yeVe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-1g/lerjwNZZuT1C8YR+p--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 329072-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Oct 2005 07:14:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 10 00:14:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ppp241-198.lns2.adl2.internode.on.net (hank.shelbyville.oz)
[203.122.241.198]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EOrrH-00008w-00; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 00:14:03 -0700
Received: from ron by hank.shelbyville.oz with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1EOrnb-0004AJ-Vn; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:40:16 +0930
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:40:15 +0930
To: Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#329072: mingw32-binutils bug 329072 still occurs
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
From: Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 02:32:03PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 14:29 +0930, Ron wrote:
>
> > Sorry, that doesn't help me much, I'm not familiar with
> > pbuilder. I'm going to need more of a hint about what the
> > real problem is.
>
> I think it is probably a problem in my pbuilder setup.
>
> > Can you build the package outside pbuilder?
>
> The initial report was made outside pbuilder, but now I can build it
> fine outside pbuilder :/
Hmm, might have been a transient thing and your cache of packages
is stale. Not sure what else might fit the bill.
> You can close this bug again.
Ok. Thanks for checking!
best,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
