Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 11:36:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line I should actually close this
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 15:50:57 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 15 08:50:56 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp112.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.229.93] 
        by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EFw0m-0001tA-00; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 08:50:56 -0700
Received: (qmail 66606 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2005 15:50:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@68.251.68.144 with 
login)
  by smtp112.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Sep 2005 15:50:25 -0000
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 3AE6DE24B5; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:50:24 -0500 (CDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ken Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ndiswrapper-source: Please update for kernel 2.6.14-rc1
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:50:23 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: ndiswrapper-source
Version: 1.2+1.3rc1-1
Severity: normal


Please update ndiswrapper to compile on 2.6.14-rc1, per the directions
at http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.ndiswrapper.general/4757

--Ken Bloom

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 328484-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 16:37:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 09:37:11 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp107.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.229.98] 
        by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1ERBVX-0000AM-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 09:37:11 -0700
Received: (qmail 33758 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2005 16:36:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) ([EMAIL PROTECTED] with login)
  by smtp107.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Oct 2005 16:36:40 -0000
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id A5F25E23FD; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 11:36:38 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 11:36:38 -0500
From: Ken Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: I should actually close this
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Version: 1.4-1

I guess I should actually close this bug now that 1.4-1 works with
2.6.14-rc4.

--Ken Bloom

--=20
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment.
See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures.

--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDUoGUlHapveKyytERAkKaAKCTvFxdnLktyFy+TIlCVAyvJB/D7gCfQDHP
VT3LlnUay9yciyYO22/7Vjc=
=vy2C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to