Your message dated Mon, 19 May 2014 11:19:17 -0400
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#714570: Make mke2fs warn before destroying an existing 
fs/LVM container
has caused the Debian Bug report #714570,
regarding Make mke2fs warn before destroying an existing fs/LVM container
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
714570: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=714570
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: util-linux
Version: 2.19.1-5
Severity: wishlist
File: /sbin/mkfs

Yesterday, for some weird reason that we can attribute to Freudian
slip behaviour, I typed mkfs instead of fsck. I noticed, hit ctrl-c
in time and was able to recover the filesystem with a superblock
backup (ext4), but it made me think:

  - mdadm asks for confirmation when overwriting a superblock;
  - pvcreate asks for confirmation when overwriting a PV;
  - cryptsetup takes an extra step to ensure that you pause for
    a second and think;

… but mkfs just does, at least the ext[234] variants.

I know about Unix and foot shooting and rope to hang yourself and
all, but wouldn't it be worth considering adding such a check to
mkfs anyway, possibly with a -f|--force option to override it?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-rc4-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_NZ, LC_CTYPE=en_NZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages util-linux depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.41          
ii  dpkg                   1.16.1.1        
ii  initscripts            2.88dsf-13.11   
ii  install-info           4.13a.dfsg.1-8  
ii  libblkid1              2.19.1-5        
ii  libc6                  2.13-21         
ii  libncurses5            5.9-2           
ii  libselinux1            2.1.0-1         
ii  libslang2              2.2.4-3         
ii  libuuid1               2.19.1-5        
ii  lsb-base               3.2-28          
ii  tzdata                 2011l-1         
ii  zlib1g                 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3

util-linux recommends no packages.

Versions of packages util-linux suggests:
pn  dosfstools          3.0.9-1 
pn  kbd                 1.15.3-7
pn  util-linux-locales  <none>  

-- debconf information excluded


-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <[email protected]>      Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer               http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck    http://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems

Attachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package: e2fsprogs
Version: 1.42.10-1

This wishlist bug has been fixed in 1.42.10.

                                    - Ted

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to