Your message dated Sat, 26 Nov 2005 14:02:18 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#338353: fixed in dnsmasq 2.24-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Nov 2005 19:34:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 09 11:34:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from qix.demiurgestudios.com [12.151.131.245] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EZvhr-0004Y0-00; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 11:34:03 -0800
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mole.internal.demiurgestudios.com)
        by qix.demiurgestudios.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1EZvhp-0008Ss-00; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 14:34:01 -0500
Received: by mole.internal.demiurgestudios.com (Postfix, from userid 501)
        id 70FCA41E306; Wed,  9 Nov 2005 14:33:35 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Andrew Moise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dnsmasq: Should not run as 'nobody'
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 14:33:34 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: dnsmasq
Version: 2.23-1
Severity: normal

  The dnsmasq process on my machine runs as 'nobody', which is an
account that basically should not be used for anything.  Since any
process owned by 'nobody' can intefere with any other process owned by
'nobody', its use by any server is significantly less secure than the
use of a special-purpose user (which is what most other daemons do,
and what I believe dnsmasq should do).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages dnsmasq depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.3.5-7    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  netbase                       4.23       Basic TCP/IP networking system

dnsmasq recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 338353-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Nov 2005 22:12:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 26 14:12:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1Eg87e-0002NU-7A; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 14:02:18 -0800
From: Simon Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $
Subject: Bug#338353: fixed in dnsmasq 2.24-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 14:02:18 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: dnsmasq
Source-Version: 2.24-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dnsmasq, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

dnsmasq_2.24-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/d/dnsmasq/dnsmasq_2.24-1.diff.gz
dnsmasq_2.24-1.dsc
  to pool/main/d/dnsmasq/dnsmasq_2.24-1.dsc
dnsmasq_2.24-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/dnsmasq/dnsmasq_2.24-1_i386.deb
dnsmasq_2.24.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/d/dnsmasq/dnsmasq_2.24.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Simon Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated dnsmasq package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2005 20:02:32 +0000
Source: dnsmasq
Binary: dnsmasq
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.24-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Simon Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Simon Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 dnsmasq    - A small caching DNS proxy and DHCP server
Closes: 304446 326057 330422 336413 338353
Changes: 
 dnsmasq (2.24-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
    * New upstream. (closes: #330422)
    * Fix typo and clean up dnsmasq.conf (closes: #326057) (closes: #304446)
    * Add build support for I18N and gettext.
    * Fixed manpage typos. (closes: #336413)
    * Create a dnsmasq-unique userid for the daemon to run as. (closes: #338353)
Files: 
 3716e09c01204f9c0300c46565e40dae 551 net optional dnsmasq_2.24-1.dsc
 2be8eae10f59bdc7943fce24a6909d39 186949 net optional dnsmasq_2.24.orig.tar.gz
 bd9b526d746f79ee2099acd290969f77 10487 net optional dnsmasq_2.24-1.diff.gz
 d2d9babbe25b700c345614506bc6a51b 145714 net optional dnsmasq_2.24-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDhyVowEl0z99oB74RAoPSAJ9Oo+dfptn8tkPYWABpXeX7C350RwCfSV57
lR/e7UMkZdNUeJ4eb8jdOsQ=
=uOnk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to