Your message dated Sat, 19 Jul 2014 00:45:12 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#755179: starpu build-depending on gcc-4.7 and
libstarpu-dev depending on gcc-4.9
has caused the Debian Bug report #755179,
regarding starpu build-depending on gcc-4.7 and libstarpu-dev depending on
gcc-4.9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
755179: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=755179
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src: startpu
Version: 1.1.0+dfsg-2
Severity: important
libstarpu-dev is currently uninstallable, because gcc-4.9 is now at version
4.9.1.
starpu is build-depending on gcc-4.7 so I would assume that it uses gcc-4.7,
however libstarpu-dev is now depending on gcc-4.9.
This seems to be wrong.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Andrei POPESCU, le Fri 18 Jul 2014 22:02:45 +0300, a écrit :
> On Vi, 18 iul 14, 16:36:41, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Package: src: startpu
> > Version: 1.1.0+dfsg-2
>
> Are you sure about the version? Both testing and unstable are already at
> 1.1.2+dfsg1.
Indeed, and starpu switched to gcc 4.9 with 1.1.2+dfsg-1.
> > libstarpu-dev is currently uninstallable, because gcc-4.9 is now at version
> > 4.9.1.
Yes, starpu depends on the precise upstream version of gcc for the
plugin support (currently 4.9.0). When a newer gcc release is uploaded,
the starpu package just needs to be rebuilt against the newer gcc.
> > starpu is build-depending on gcc-4.7 so I would assume that it uses gcc-4.7,
The current version, no, it build-depends on and uses gcc-4.9.
> > however libstarpu-dev is now depending on gcc-4.9.
The current version, yes. And on gcc 4.9.0 more precisely. It just
needs a rebuild against 4.9.1 now. I have queued it.
Samuel
--- End Message ---
