Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:50:07 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326228: approx: fails when many clients update
simultaneously
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Sep 2005 15:01:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 02 08:01:57 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from crown.reflexsecurity.com [69.15.40.52]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBD3F-0004uI-00; Fri, 02 Sep 2005 08:01:57 -0700
Received: from barton.reflex ([172.16.8.3])
by crown.reflexsecurity.com with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1EBD3E-0006zC-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 02 Sep 2005 11:01:56 -0400
Received: (nullmailer pid 30557 invoked by uid 1000);
Fri, 02 Sep 2005 15:01:56 -0000
From: Jason Lunz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: approx: fails when many clients update simultaneously
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 11:01:56 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
WEIRD_PORT autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: approx
Version: 1.18
Severity: normal
I'm running a backport of approx 1.18 on a sarge server. It works fine
serving about 30 client machines.
Many of the clients are running apticron, which installs
/etc/cron.daily/apticron. The clients are also mostly ntp-synced. This
means that each morning around 06:27, a bunch of clients simultaneously
do "apt-get update". Each day, many of them fail and generate emails
like this:
/etc/cron.daily/apticron:
gzip: stdin: not in gzip format
Failed to fetch
http://approx-host:9999/security/dists/stable/updates/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz
Sub-process gzip returned an error code (1)
W: Couldn't stat source package list http://approx-host stable/updates/main
Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/approx-host:9999_security_dists_stable_updates_main_binary-i386_Packages)
- stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: Couldn't stat source package list http://approx-host stable/updates/main
Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/approx-host:9999_security_dists_stable_updates_main_binary-i386_Packages)
- stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
E: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones
used instead.
run-parts: /etc/cron.daily/apticron exited with return code 100
even the server itself, using approx via localhost:9999 sees these
failures.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.2
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages approx depends on:
ii bzip2 1.0.2-7 high-quality block-sorting file co
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libcurl3 7.13.2-2 Multi-protocol file transfer libra
ii libidn11 0.5.13-1.0 GNU libidn library, implementation
ii libpcre3 4.5-1.2sarge1 Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi
ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries
ii wget 1.9.1-12 retrieves files from the web
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4.sarge.2 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 326228-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2006 17:43:15 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 10 09:43:15 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ux9.sp.cs.cmu.edu ([128.2.220.166])
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EwNWd-0001Y7-G9
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:43:15 -0800
Received: from c-24-3-154-200.hsd1.pa.comcast.net ([24.3.154.200])
by ux9.sp.cs.cmu.edu id aa25202; 10 Jan 2006 12:42 EST
Received: from ecc by stratocaster.home with local (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
id 1EwNWB-0004LL-Lg
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:42:47 -0500
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:42:47 -0500
Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from CMU-MX1.andrew.cmu.edu ([128.2.11.1]) by ux9.sp.cs.cmu.edu
id aa24392; 10 Jan 2006 11:50 EST
Received: from crown.reflexsecurity.com (crown.reflexsecurity.com [69.15.40.52])
by cmu-mx1.andrew.cmu.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0AGo9rd026281
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:50:10 -0500
Received: from knob.reflex ([172.16.8.104])
by crown.reflexsecurity.com with smtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EwMhD-0006wi-Lh
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:50:07 -0500
Received: (nullmailer pid 4086 invoked by uid 1000);
Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:50:07 -0000
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:50:07 -0500
From: Jason Lunz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Eric Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#326228: approx: fails when many clients update simultaneously
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Clean: 7% (__CD 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0,
__MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0)
X-Greylist: Message is not spam, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0
(cmu-mx1.andrew.cmu.edu [128.2.11.1]); Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:50:10 -0500 (EST)
Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:42:47 -0500
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 04:59:45PM -0500, Eric Cooper wrote:
> > I'll run it over the weekend and let you know what happens when all the
> > cron jobs hit it each morning.
>
> Thanks very much.
the morning cron.daily run has hit approx for several mornings straight
now, and apart from the http header corruption we talked about it, I
haven't seen any problems. I think you can close the bug.
--
Jason Lunz | Senior Developer | Reflex Security, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
