Your message dated Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:33:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Was fixed in 0.23-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Sep 2005 05:00:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 06 22:00:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from www.frogcircus.org (mail.frogcircus.org) [64.251.25.83]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ECs2U-00078j-00; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 22:00:02 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
(uid 1000)
by mail.frogcircus.org with local; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 01:00:01 -0400
id 001A7B41.431E73D1.000045EB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: jwm: incorrect homepage
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 01:00:01 -0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: jwm
Severity: wishlist
It looks like a more appropriate homepage to give for this program would
be:
http://www.joewing.net/programs/jwm/
I almost gave up on the one you list before I found the magic link. :-)
Charles
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (90, 'testing'), (80, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.4
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 327013-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2006 23:33:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 22 15:33:17 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fep32-0.kolumbus.fi ([193.229.0.63] helo=fep32-app.kolumbus.fi)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1F0ohx-0000XQ-DQ
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 15:33:17 -0800
Received: from cante.net ([81.197.0.130]) by fep32-app.kolumbus.fi
with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:33:15 +0200
From: Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Was fixed in 0.23-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:33:16 +0200
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Version: 0.23-3
The URL bug was already closed in 0.23, but due to typo in
debian/changelog the BTS did not notice the "Close:"
statement.
Jari
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
