Your message dated Sat, 4 Feb 2006 22:25:42 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#246033: This bug can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --->From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 26 14:34:56 2004 Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2004 21:34:56 +0000 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mailout08.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.20] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BIDke-0005d7-00; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 14:34:56 -0700 Received: from fwd06.aul.t-online.de by mailout08.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1BIDkc-00040Z-00; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 23:34:54 +0200 Received: from stargate.galaxy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by fmrl06.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1BIDkT-0heNLU0; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 23:34:45 +0200 Received: by stargate.galaxy (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 73CDC18960; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 23:34:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 23:34:44 +0200 From: Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Status of the bug #196995 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Debbugs-Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Micha=EB?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?l?= Parienti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Seen: false X-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: slapd Version: 2.1.29-2 Severity: normal Hi Micha=EBl,=20 On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 07:21:01PM +0200, Micha=EBl Parienti wrote: > I don't understand the status of the bug #196995, which is=20 > 'archived', tagged as 'pending', and declared as 'closed' in the=20 > changelog of the debian package, but still happens, to me at least. Can you please provide more details? The bug is supposed to be fixed... > Did you try the work around described here: > http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200312/msg00550.html That's a completely different problem. The original bug report was about the slapd package not including back_ldap and back_meta.=20 On my system back_ldap seems to load fine, while with back_meta and=20 slapd -d 16383 I get lt_dlopenext failed: (back_meta)=20 /usr/lib/ldap/back_meta.so: undefined symbol: mapping_cmp I am opening a bug report for this. Greetings Torsten --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAjYB0dQgHtVUb5EcRAlGAAJ9UkCGpNbSYwldRbi+Mq5iNoR7enACfXRG0 eFXNq2Pd/PYR7IpSP5KuNjg= =9M7b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt--
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --->From SRS0=n/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 04 13:25:56 2006 Received: (at 246033-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Feb 2006 21:25:56 +0000 Return-path: <SRS0=n/[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F5Uup-0003H1-LE for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 13:25:55 -0800 Received: from [84.141.24.50] (helo=stargate.galaxy) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu5) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML25U-1F5Uud1B45-0001Qw; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 22:25:53 +0100 Received: by stargate.galaxy (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C102D1807A; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 22:25:42 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 22:25:42 +0100 From: Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Cedric Delfosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#246033: This bug can be closed Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="V0207lvV8h4k8FAm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] login:d638a0eb9c9fbc21c426336ab6dfa19b X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --V0207lvV8h4k8FAm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 08:24:47PM +0100, Cedric Delfosse wrote: > The meta backend loads fine on current Etch slapd version (2.2.26-8). >=20 > So I think this bug can be closed. =20 Agreed. Closing it. Torsten --V0207lvV8h4k8FAm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD5RvWdQgHtVUb5EcRAvInAJ9AIcmvAdJYrDrpnjgeQuBx1ohfhgCeJKwl BfJeYw3kKzraoA/ZXSb//fw= =LY1Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --V0207lvV8h4k8FAm--
--- End Message ---
