Your message dated Sat, 4 Feb 2006 22:24:56 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#101602: This bug can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --->From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 20 05:26:43 2001 Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jun 2001 10:26:43 +0000 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from ivanova.coker.com.au [::ffff:203.36.46.209] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15CfC7-00076d-00; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 05:26:43 -0500 Received: from lyta.coker.com.au (ivanova [127.0.0.1]) by ivanova.coker.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6B77FA85; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 20:26:31 +1000 (EST) Received: by lyta.coker.com.au (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D15FBB11C; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:23:43 +0200 (CEST) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: slapd: Wish it was built with ACI support To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.9 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:23:43 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: slapd Version: 2.0.11-1.rjc Severity: wishlist Could you please add "--enable-aci" to the ./configure command so that it is built with ACI support? I realise that ACI is still a bit experimental (in particular there is no adequate documentation), but if you just ignore it then it has no affect (apart from a few K of extra code).
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --->From SRS0=n/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 04 13:25:00 2006 Received: (at 101602-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Feb 2006 21:25:00 +0000 Return-path: <SRS0=n/[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.188]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F5Utw-00036v-3X for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 13:25:00 -0800 Received: from [84.141.24.50] (helo=stargate.galaxy) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu3) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKxQS-1F5Utt3U4I-0000Cn; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 22:24:58 +0100 Received: by stargate.galaxy (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A94F11807A; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 22:24:56 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 22:24:56 +0100 From: Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Cedric Delfosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#101602: This bug can be closed Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] login:d638a0eb9c9fbc21c426336ab6dfa19b X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Cedric,=20 On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 08:03:20PM +0100, Cedric Delfosse wrote: > Openldap2.2 for Sarge and Etch are already compiled with --enable-aci. >=20 > So I think this bug can be closed. Yes, you are right. Thanks for checking! Greetings Torsten --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD5RundQgHtVUb5EcRAlqGAJ97L8CoSWkIq1PM11jHwY+BhXaq2gCfUMG0 Iunqzt1Ikg4kTrz70QX/KBA= =Gn7D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N--
--- End Message ---
