Your message dated Wed, 14 Nov 2018 17:01:43 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: firewalld: rich rules don't allow destination masks
has caused the Debian Bug report #910068,
regarding firewalld: rich rules don't allow destination masks
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
910068: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=910068
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: firewalld
Version: 0.6.2-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
issuing a rish rule that includes a mask sush as
# firewall-cmd --add-rich-rule='rule family="ipv4" destination
address="239.0.0.0/8" accept'
results in an error:
ERROR: Failed to apply rules. A firewall reload might solve the issue if the
firewall has been modified using ip*tables or ebtables.
ERROR: '/usr/sbin/nft add rule inet firewalld filter_IN_public_allow meta
nfproto ipv4 ip6 daddr 239.0.0.0/8 accept' failed: Error: conflicting protocols
specified: ip vs. ip6#012add rule inet firewalld filter_IN_public_allow meta
nfproto ipv4 ip6 daddr 239.0.0.0/8 accept#012
This is already patched in Firewalld Github' master branch.
Versions of packages firewalld depends on:
ii dbus 1.12.10-1
ii gir1.2-glib-2.0 1.58.0-1
ii iptables 1.6.2-1.1
ii nftables 0.9.0-1
ii policykit-1 0.105-21
ii python3 3.6.6-1
ii python3-dbus 1.2.8-2+b1
ii python3-gi 3.30.1-1
ii python3-slip-dbus 0.6.5-2
Versions of packages firewalld recommends:
ii ebtables 2.0.10.4-5
ii ipset 6.34-1
firewalld suggests no packages.
-- Configuration Files:
/etc/firewalld/firewalld.conf [Errno 13] Permiso denegado:
'/etc/firewalld/firewalld.conf'
/etc/firewalld/lockdown-whitelist.xml [Errno 13] Permiso denegado:
'/etc/firewalld/lockdown-whitelist.xml'
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.6.3-1
On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 11:45:23 +0200 Pavel Kreuzt <[email protected]> wrote:
> Package: firewalld
> Version: 0.6.2-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> issuing a rish rule that includes a mask sush as
>
> # firewall-cmd --add-rich-rule='rule family="ipv4" destination
> address="239.0.0.0/8" accept'
>
> results in an error:
>
> ERROR: Failed to apply rules. A firewall reload might solve the issue if the
> firewall has been modified using ip*tables or ebtables.
> ERROR: '/usr/sbin/nft add rule inet firewalld filter_IN_public_allow meta
> nfproto ipv4 ip6 daddr 239.0.0.0/8 accept' failed: Error: conflicting
> protocols specified: ip vs. ip6#012add rule inet firewalld
> filter_IN_public_allow meta nfproto ipv4 ip6 daddr 239.0.0.0/8 accept#012
>
> This is already patched in Firewalld Github' master branch.
This particular commit was cherry-picked for 0.6.3, so closing the
downstream bug report accordingly.
Regards,
Michael
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
