Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2019 20:44:11 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#684409: texlive-lang-french: missing dependencies for
facture class
has caused the Debian Bug report #684409,
regarding texlive-lang-french: missing dependencies for facture class
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
684409: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684409
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: texlive-lang-french
Version: 2012.20120611-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
the texlive-lang-french provides (among others) the facture class. To be
used, this class requires the following packages:
- texlive-xetex, for the xetex/xelatex binary
- texlive-latex-extra, for makecmds.sty
- etoolbox, for etoolbox.sty
- texlive-generic-extra, for fltpoint.sty.
I'm not sure whether these should be mandatory or only recommanded
dependencies, but it would help a lot not having to look for them one by one.
Kind regards,
-- Gabriel Kerneis
######################################
List of ls-R files
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1544 Aug 9 18:55 /var/lib/texmf/ls-R
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 Apr 23 16:04 /usr/share/texmf/ls-R ->
/var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 Jun 26 00:39 /usr/share/texlive/texmf/ls-R ->
/var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXLIVEMAIN
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root staff 80 Aug 9 18:32 /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 Jun 26 00:39 /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/ls-R ->
/var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXLIVEDIST
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 Jun 26 00:39 /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/ls-R ->
/var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXLIVEDIST
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 Jun 26 00:39 /usr/share/texlive/texmf/ls-R ->
/var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXLIVEMAIN
######################################
Config files
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 475 May 10 21:53 /etc/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4531 Aug 9 18:55 /var/lib/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Jun 26 00:39 /usr/share/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg ->
/var/lib/texmf/updmap.cfg-DEBIAN
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3731 Aug 9 18:55
/var/lib/texmf/tex/generic/config/language.dat
######################################
Files in /etc/texmf/web2c/
total 8
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 283 Jun 26 2011 mktex.cnf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 475 May 10 21:53 texmf.cnf
######################################
md5sums of texmf.d
ca40c66f144b4bafc3e59a2dd32ecb9c /etc/texmf/texmf.d/00debian.cnf
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages texlive-lang-french depends on:
ii dpkg 1.16.3
ii tex-common 3.10
ii texlive-base 2012.20120611-3
ii texlive-common 2012.20120611-3
texlive-lang-french recommends no packages.
texlive-lang-french suggests no packages.
Versions of packages tex-common depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.42
ii dpkg 1.16.3
ii ucf 3.0025+nmu3
Versions of packages tex-common suggests:
ii debhelper 9.20120419
Versions of packages texlive-lang-french is related to:
ii tex-common 3.10
ii texlive-binaries 2012.20120628-2
-- debconf information:
tex-common/check_texmf_wrong:
tex-common/check_texmf_missing:
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Am 12.08.2012 um 12:18 teilte Frank Kuester mit:
> Gabriel Kerneis <[email protected]> writes:
Hi,
>> the texlive-lang-french provides (among others) the facture class. To be
>> used, this class requires the following packages:
>> - texlive-xetex, for the xetex/xelatex binary
>> - texlive-latex-extra, for makecmds.sty
>> - etoolbox, for etoolbox.sty
>> - texlive-generic-extra, for fltpoint.sty.
>>
>> I'm not sure whether these should be mandatory or only recommanded
>> dependencies, but it would help a lot not having to look for them one by one.
>
> They are for sure not mandatory, since not everyone who installs
> texlive-lang-french wants to use the facture class. Unless you convince
> me that most or at least really many french TeX users use it, I think
> that even Recommends is too much. The question is rather whether we
> make it a Suggests - or nothing at all,
>
I vote for not change anything. Yes, I'm not very stringent in my
decisions: when there are only small changes I apply them.
In this case however people should use the apt-file tool and start
searching for the file they need to compile a specific document. We
can't solve every kind of missing deps.
Sorry!
Hilmar
--
sigfault
#206401 http://counter.li.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
