Your message dated Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:12:16 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#910558: Insufficient privileges on trustedkeys.gpg
has caused the Debian Bug report #910558,
regarding Insufficient privileges on trustedkeys.gpg
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
910558: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=910558
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: flatpak
Version: 1.0.3-1
Severity: minor

While running

  # flatpak -vv remote-add --if-not-exists flathub 
https://flathub.org/repo/flathub.flatpakrepo

the file /var/lib/flatpak/repo/flathub.trustedkeys.gpg was created
with permissions 0640, which means that regular users weren't able
to interact with flatpak until I added o+r.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.18.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_NZ, LC_CTYPE=en_NZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_NZ:en 
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages flatpak depends on:
ii  bubblewrap             0.3.1-2
ii  libappstream-glib8     0.7.12-1
ii  libarchive13           3.2.2-5
ii  libc6                  2.27-6
ii  libglib2.0-0           2.58.1-2
ii  libgpgme11             1.11.1-1
ii  libjson-glib-1.0-0     1.4.2-4
ii  libostree-1-1          2018.8-2
ii  libpolkit-gobject-1-0  0.105-21
ii  libseccomp2            2.3.3-3
ii  libsoup2.4-1           2.64.1-1
ii  libxau6                1:1.0.8-1+b2
ii  libxml2                2.9.4+dfsg1-7+b1
ii  xdg-desktop-portal     1.0.2-1

Versions of packages flatpak recommends:
ii  desktop-file-utils                                   0.23-3
ii  gtk-update-icon-cache                                3.24.1-2
ii  hicolor-icon-theme                                   0.17-2
ii  libpam-systemd                                       239-10
ii  p11-kit                                              0.23.14-2
ii  policykit-1                                          0.105-21
ii  shared-mime-info                                     1.10-1
pn  xdg-desktop-portal-gtk | xdg-desktop-portal-backend  <none>

Versions of packages flatpak suggests:
pn  avahi-daemon  <none>

-- no debconf information


-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <[email protected]> @martinkrafft
: :'  :  proud Debian developer
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems

Attachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital GPG signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.3.3-1

On Mon, 08 Oct 2018 at 17:31:42 +1300, Martin F Krafft wrote:
> While running
> 
>   # flatpak -vv remote-add --if-not-exists flathub 
> https://flathub.org/repo/flathub.flatpakrepo
> 
> the file /var/lib/flatpak/repo/flathub.trustedkeys.gpg was created
> with permissions 0640, which means that regular users weren't able
> to interact with flatpak until I added o+r.

This seems like https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/2114 which
was fixed in 76898c430934ce476eb64a65a373d4646b29a3c0 "Enforce a more
permissive umask".

    smcv

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to