Your message dated Mon, 27 Apr 2020 17:36:52 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: debhelper: recommends compat level 13, but
debhelper-compat (= 13) missing from stable
has caused the Debian Bug report #958933,
regarding debhelper: recommends compat level 13, but debhelper-compat (= 13)
missing from stable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
958933: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=958933
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: debhelper
Severity: normal
Control: block 958932 by -1
Hi,
Why is debhelper-compat (= 13) not available in stable, please, when
compat level 13 is being recommended?
The lack prevents most artifacts in Lintian's test suite from building
on stable and therefore cannot be implemented in Lintian. It leads to
false positives for the tag
package-uses-experimental-debhelper-compat-version. For details,
please see the bug blocked by this one.
Kind regards
Felix Lechner
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: debhelper
Source-Version: 13~bpo10+1
On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 14:16:26 -0700 Felix Lechner
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Package: debhelper
> Severity: normal
> Control: block 958932 by -1
>
> Hi,
>
> Why is debhelper-compat (= 13) not available in stable, please, when
> compat level 13 is being recommended?
>
> The lack prevents most artifacts in Lintian's test suite from building
> on stable and therefore cannot be implemented in Lintian. It leads to
> false positives for the tag
> package-uses-experimental-debhelper-compat-version. For details,
> please see the bug blocked by this one.
>
> Kind regards
> Felix Lechner
>
>
--- End Message ---