Hello, On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 09:50:49AM -0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tuesday, January 18, 2005 9:06 AM, Helge Kreutzmann > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Package: www.debian.org > > Version: N/A; reported 2005-01-18 > > Severity: minor > > > > I wanted to look at the RC bug > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no&bug=289601 > > > > which was closed without comment. > > It was /not/ closed without comment. Admittedly the comment is only in the > subject header of the mail to -done, but it provides the answer to all of > your other questions.
Ok, I see it now. But its not very convenient right now to look at the headers in bug reports, so I usually skip them (sometimes I look at the date). Otherwise: Yes, I see the error <snip> > http://packages.debian.org/lusernet.app works fine, as does making the > appropriate change in the PTS search and URL. Unfortunately you also skipped b) of my mail. IMHO http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/lusernet.html should not simply be blank, at least return a 404. > The PTS should probably be fixed to cope better with no longer existing / > renamed / merged source packages, but I'm not entirely sure what the best > way to do that would be. Yep, so feel free to retitle and use severity wishlist. Thanks for replying so quickly. Greetings Helge -- Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg signed mail preferred 64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm Help keep free software "libre": http://www.freepatents.org/
pgp83gXuTXUpl.pgp
Description: PGP signature