On Sat, 2005-01-22 at 13:37 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Sat, 22.01.05 12:29, Scott James Remnant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 17:46 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > > > Plase apply this trivial patch: > > > > > > http://0pointer.de/public/libtool.patch > > > > > > It fixes a memory leak which makes long running processes that > > > repeatedly load/unload modules become memory hoggers and as such > > > unusable. > > > Has this bug been submitted to and/or applied upstream? > > Since this has been sitting in the Debian BTS for three month now and > nothing has changed yet, I posted it to the BTS of Savannah just > yesterday. It seems to have been closed shortly after, although I > cannot find it in the CVS yet: > > http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/index.php?func=detailitem&item_id=3670 > Ok, that seems to indicate that it's been fixed for the upcoming 2.0 release.
Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
